[PATCH 10/12] receive-pack: fix misleading namespace/.have comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The comment claims that we handle alternate ".have" lines
through this function, but that hasn't been the case since
85f251045 (write_head_info(): handle "extra refs" locally,
2012-01-06).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
 builtin/receive-pack.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index 27bb52988..8f8762e4a 100644
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
@@ -261,10 +261,7 @@ static int show_ref_cb(const char *path_full, const struct object_id *oid,
 	/*
 	 * Advertise refs outside our current namespace as ".have"
 	 * refs, so that the client can use them to minimize data
-	 * transfer but will otherwise ignore them. This happens to
-	 * cover ".have" that are thrown in by add_one_alternate_ref()
-	 * to mark histories that are complete in our alternates as
-	 * well.
+	 * transfer but will otherwise ignore them.
 	 */
 	if (!path)
 		path = ".have";
-- 
2.11.0.765.g454d2182f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]