Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 01/09, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> How does this relate to the 5-patch real_path: series that has been >> >> on 'next' since last year? >> > >> > The only difference should be in the first patch of the series which >> > handles the #define a bit differently due to the discussion that >> > happened last week. >> > >> > Here is the interdiff between v5 and 'origin/bw/realpath-wo-chdir': >> >> Then can you make that an incremental patch (or two) with its own >> log message instead? It (or they) would look and smell like a >> bugfix patch that follows up a change that has already landed. As >> you know, we won't eject and replace patches that are already in >> 'next' during a development cycle. >> >> Thanks. > > Yes I'll get right on that. Thanks. Will queue.