On 01/09, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> How does this relate to the 5-patch real_path: series that has been > >> on 'next' since last year? > > > > The only difference should be in the first patch of the series which > > handles the #define a bit differently due to the discussion that > > happened last week. > > > > Here is the interdiff between v5 and 'origin/bw/realpath-wo-chdir': > > Then can you make that an incremental patch (or two) with its own > log message instead? It (or they) would look and smell like a > bugfix patch that follows up a change that has already landed. As > you know, we won't eject and replace patches that are already in > 'next' during a development cycle. > > Thanks. Yes I'll get right on that. -- Brandon Williams