On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 07:07:19PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:10:10AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: >> > diff --git a/parse-options.c b/parse-options.c >> > index 312a85dbd..4fbe924a5 100644 >> > --- a/parse-options.c >> > +++ b/parse-options.c >> > @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ void NORETURN usage_msg_opt(const char *msg, >> > const char * const *usagestr, >> > const struct option *options) >> > { >> > - fprintf(stderr, "%s\n\n", msg); >> > + fprintf(stderr, "fatal: %s\n\n", msg); >> >> Your commit message does not make clear if you want this "fatal" to be >> grep-able (by scripts) or not. If not, please _() the string. Maybe >> this to reduce work for translators >> >> /* TRANSLATORS: this is the prefix before usage error */ >> fprintf(stderr, "%s %s\n\n", _("fatal:"), msg); > > I don't think we translate any of our "fatal:", "error:", etc, do we? > It certainly doesn't look like it in usage.c. I know. But those existed before the l10n starts, some of those belong to plumbing messages. This one is new. -- Duy