On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -426,8 +423,7 @@ void parse_pathspec(struct pathspec *pathspec,
> nr_exclude++;
> if (item[i].magic & magic_mask)
> unsupported_magic(entry,
> - item[i].magic & magic_mask,
> - short_magic);
> + item[i].magic & magic_mask);
Same here. Maybe put both arguments in the same line. It looks a bit
better. (sorry for two mails on the same patch, I'm reading the final
output first before going through individual patches that breaks this
function down)
>
> if ((flags & PATHSPEC_SYMLINK_LEADING_PATH) &&
> has_symlink_leading_path(item[i].match, item[i].len)) {
--
Duy