On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:
On Wednesday 2007 April 25, Julian Phillips wrote:
While I like the idea of private tags, I find the idea of them having
their own namespace to be much more attractive than simply having the
ability to not export lightweight tags.
The problem I have with this is that in my mind lightweight tags /are/
bookmarks - why create another namespace for them with all the extra code
that is needed to deal with them? If we implemented this bookmark stuff then
I can't envisage ever using a lightweight tag.
Well, I was thinking more about having private full tags ... but I think
the tagopt thing you mentioned later already covers it.
Maybe I'm missing the point - what do people see lightweight tags as useful
for if not for marking revisions in a not-to-be-published fashion?
I use them in private projects 'cos I'm lazy - but that's not really
relevant ...
--
Julian
---
Lewis's Law of Travel:
The first piece of luggage out of the chute doesn't belong to anyone,
ever.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html