On Wednesday 2007 April 25, Julian Phillips wrote: > While I like the idea of private tags, I find the idea of them having > their own namespace to be much more attractive than simply having the > ability to not export lightweight tags. The problem I have with this is that in my mind lightweight tags /are/ bookmarks - why create another namespace for them with all the extra code that is needed to deal with them? If we implemented this bookmark stuff then I can't envisage ever using a lightweight tag. Maybe I'm missing the point - what do people see lightweight tags as useful for if not for marking revisions in a not-to-be-published fashion? Andy -- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html