On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 20:17 -0400, A Large Angry SCM wrote: > > Can we please use a more descriptive namespace name than 'bm'? For some people with active imaginations 'bm' might be too descriptive :). (Sorry for the OT, but I couldn't resist). Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part