Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > So I don't feel like we have a good patch for the general case yet, and > I'm probably not going to get around to implementing it anytime soon. So > I'd suggest taking David's original patch (to punt when the response is > empty) in the meantime. Yup, we are on the same page; the above matches what I wrote in the draft of the next issue of What's cooking report last night. > I do think the commit message could be improved based on the discussion > here, though (at the very least to describe the nature of the deadlock, > and that we are choosing only one of the possible solutions, and why). Thanks. That sounds sensible.