On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:02:27PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Actually, I take it back. I think it works for a single round of ref > > negotiation, but not for multiple. Enabling GIT_TEST_LONG=1 causes it to > > fail t5551. > > > > I think I've probably made a mis-assumption on exactly when in the HTTP > > protocol we will see a flush packet (and perhaps that is a sign that > > this protocol-snooping approach is not a good one). > > Hmph. I think I tried David's original under GIT_TEST_LONG and saw > it got stuck; could be the same issue, I guess. It works OK here. I think it is just that the test is really slow (by design). -Peff