Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] bug fix with push --dry-run and submodules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/17, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > v2 of this series is just a small cleanup of removing a nested sub-shell from a
> > test and rebasing on the latest version of
> > 'origin/hv/submodule-not-yet-pushed-fix'
> >
> > As stated above this series is based on 'origin/hv/submodule-not-yet-pushed-fix'
> 
> an interdiff to v1 would be nice :)
> 
> Now t5531 is inconsistent in style,
> how much time would you estimate to add a commit to refactor
> that test to follow the style with excessive use of -C for
> all the other tests and avoiding subshells there, too?

I didn't change to an excessive use of the -C option, but rather
eliminated the nested-subshell and instead cd'ed to the required
directories in the subshell.  Excessive use of -C seemed to greatly
reduce the readability of the test (at least it did to me).

-- 
Brandon Williams



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]