Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] bug fix with push --dry-run and submodules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> v2 of this series is just a small cleanup of removing a nested sub-shell from a
> test and rebasing on the latest version of
> 'origin/hv/submodule-not-yet-pushed-fix'
>
> As stated above this series is based on 'origin/hv/submodule-not-yet-pushed-fix'

an interdiff to v1 would be nice :)

Now t5531 is inconsistent in style,
how much time would you estimate to add a commit to refactor
that test to follow the style with excessive use of -C for
all the other tests and avoiding subshells there, too?
(It's mainly Windows that benefits from such a refactoring immediately,
but consistency is a really nice feat for the long term code health
of the Git project)

Apart from one nit (and this refactoring decision/consistency discussion),
the series looks good!

Thanks,
Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]