Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:54:17 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>, git <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <xmqqshqux9il.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <f4336a7fa3df8c0b426c3d01ada8d7d8f38e588a.1478881741.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> <xmqq37iy3q0s.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> <fa11def5-a878-a5c8-6e7b-627ea8cda7e2@kdbg.org> <2b69d098-92ef-77b0-367a-516e9edbe257@kdbg.org> <xmqqa8d53ky9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611121237230.3746@virtualbox> <xmqqtwbcyyfe.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> <0BEC2674-20B5-4AD1-851A-97CA34C0CE7F@gmail.com> <xmqqshqux9il.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)

Hi Junio,

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Dscho's mention of 'still times out' may be an indiciation that
> something unspecified on 'pu' is not ready to be merged to 'next',
> but blocking all of 'pu' with a blanket statement is not useful,
> and that was where my response comes from.

Until the time when the test suite takes less than the insane three hours
to run, I am afraid that a blanket statement on `pu` is the best I can do.

Ciao,
Johannes

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
  - From: Johannes Schindelin

References:
- [PATCH] mingw: hot-fix t5615
  - From: Johannes Schindelin
- Re: [PATCH] mingw: hot-fix t5615
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [PATCH] mingw: hot-fix t5615
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
  - From: Johannes Schindelin
- Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
  - From: Lars Schneider
- Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: gitweb html validation
Next by Date: Re: Protecting old temporary objects being reused from concurrent "git gc"?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]