Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I am not sure. Certainly we would want to make sure that the normal >> case (i.e. no funny trailing junk) to work correctly, but we do want >> to protect the fix from future breakage as well, no? > > Exactly. So not intermediate "root" that we clone from, but adapting the > relative URLs. Maybe half the broken tests can switch to 'root' and the others > go with the current behavior of cloning . to super. >> >> Perhaps we can do a preliminary step to update tests to primarily >> check the cases that do not involve URL with trailing "/." by either >> doing that double clone, or more preferrably, clone from "$(pwd)" >> and adjust the incorrect submodule reference that have been relying >> on the buggy behaviour. With that "root" trick, the test would pass >> with or without the fix under discussion, right? > > I assume so, (not tested). OK. Thanks for sticking with it.