Re: [PATCHv2] attr: convert to new threadsafe API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This version adds the actual thread safety,
> that is promised in the documentation, however it doesn't add any optimization,
> i.e. it's a single global lock. But as we do not expect contention, that is fine.

Because we have to start _somewhere_, I agree it is a good approach
to first try the simplest implementation and then optimize later,
but is it an agreed consensus that we do not expect contention?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]