Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Can we please have the following change instead? I think it makes sense
> to deviate from the usual conventions in a case like this.
You have at least two independent changes relative to Dscho's
version.
(1) Show line breaks more prominently by avoiding "\n\n" and
breaking the string at "\n"; this matches the way how the
result would be displayed more closely to how the source looks
like.
(2) Ignore the usual indentation rule and have messages start at
the left end of the source.
Which one are you saying "makes sense" to? Both?
I guess both can be grouped together into one theme: match the way
the final output and the source code look like.
If that is the motivation behind "makes sense", I'd prefer to see
the change explained explicitly with that rationale in the log
message.
Thanks. I personally agree with that motivation (if the one I
guessed above is your motivation, that is).
> Note that this is an error() text, hence, there should not be a
> fullstop on the first line. That's now a good excuse to start the next
> sentence on a new line; hence, this is not a faithful conversion to _()
> anymore (a will happily take authorship and all blame if you don't
> want to for this reason). Also note that _( is not moved to the
> beginning of the line because it would be picked up as hunk header by
> git diff.
>
> ---- 8< ----
> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] sequencer: mark all error messages for translation
>
> There was actually only one error message that was not yet marked for
> translation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sequencer.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 95a382e..79f7aa4 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -515,16 +515,20 @@ static int run_git_commit(const char *defmsg, struct replay_opts *opts,
> if (!env) {
> const char *gpg_opt = gpg_sign_opt_quoted(opts);
>
> - return error("you have staged changes in your working "
> - "tree. If these changes are meant to be\n"
> - "squashed into the previous commit, run:\n\n"
> - " git commit --amend %s\n\n"
> - "If they are meant to go into a new commit, "
> - "run:\n\n"
> - " git commit %s\n\n"
> - "In both cases, once you're done, continue "
> - "with:\n\n"
> - " git rebase --continue\n", gpg_opt, gpg_opt);
> + return error(_(
> +"you have staged changes in your working tree\n"
> +"If these changes are meant to be squashed into the previous commit, run:\n"
> +"\n"
> +" git commit --amend %s\n"
> +"\n"
> +"If they are meant to go into a new commit, run:\n"
> +"\n"
> +" git commit %s\n"
> +"\n"
> +"In both cases, once you're done, continue with:\n"
> +"\n"
> +" git rebase --continue\n"),
> + gpg_opt, gpg_opt);
> }
> }