Re: [PATCH 5/5] versioncmp: cope with common leading parts in versionsort.prereleaseSuffix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



SZEDER Gábor <szeder@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Gut feeling tells me that I should take this as a subtle
> encouragement to look into adding 'versionsort.postreleasesuffix',
> shouldn't I ;)

It is more like "this made me realize that these are merely 'suffix'
after the real release name, no pre- or post- about them", also
known as "I think PREreleasesuffix was a mistake and we weren't
thinking clearly enough when we added it."

To me, this looks like a list of possible suffixes that can include
an empty suffix to denote "the real thing", e.g.

    versionsort.suffix = "-alpha" "-beta" "" "-gamma" "-delta"

and that position in the list determines the order of things inside
the same family of versions that share the same "non-suffix" part.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]