Re: [RFC/PATCH] attr: Document a new possible thread safe API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think so, instead of resending the documentation, maybe the header
> file shows that we're on the same page, I converted everything except
> attr.c to follow this header attr.h:

OK.  The function signature of git_check_attr() looks suspect (it
does not match the "typical case" illustration in the message you
are responding to), but other than that I think this matches my
expectation.

Thanks for taking this over.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]