On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:46:06PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: >> >> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining: >> >> >> >> --rfc:: >> >> Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given. >> >> >> >> Would: >> >> Shorthand for `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` >> >> be a better reading? I feel like using "pretend" is a bit weird here. > > My patch used "Alias for"; if you prefer "Shorthand for" I'm > indifferent. :) Alias seems fine to me. Thanks, Jake