Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote:
>> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining:
>>
>>   --rfc::
>>       Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given.
>>

Would:

Shorthand for `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'`

be a better reading? I feel like using "pretend" is a bit weird here.

That being said, I'm not super strongly against it, but just find that
it sounds weird for documentation.

Thanks,
Jake



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]