2016-08-26 21:06 GMT+02:00 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Introduce option --exclude-guides to the help command. With this option
>> being passed, "git help" will open man pages only for actual commands.
>
> Let's hide this option from command help of "git help" itself, drop
> the short-and-sweet "-e", not command-line complete it, and leave it
> not-mentioned here.
>
> It is a different story if this option would really help the end
> users, but I do not think that is the case. If this were to face
> the end users properly, we would need to worry about making sure
> that "git help -g -e" would error out, and getting all the other
> possible corner cases right. I do not think the amount of effort
> required to do so (even the "trying to enumerate what other possible
> corner cases there may be" part) is worth it.
>
I'm fine with that as the reason for me was just a "why not?", and
you just gave the reason to not do this. Thanks
>> In the test script we do two things I'd like to point out:
>>
>>> + test_config help.htmlpath test://html &&
>>
>> As we pass a URL, Git won't check if the given path looks like
>> a documentation directory. Another solution would be to create
>> a directory, add a file "git.html" to it and just use this path.
>
> I think this is OK; with s|As we pass a URL|As we pass a string with
> :// in it|, the first sentence can be a in-code comment in the test
> that does this and will help readers of the code in the future.
>
Hmm. The "://" is really a URL thing. That's why it's in the code, no?
The code may have some room for improvements in checking for
URLs.
>>> + test_config help.browser firefox
>>
>> Git checks if the browser is known, so the "test-browser" needs to
>> pretend it is one of them.
>
> Are you talking about the hardcoded list in valid_tool() helper
> function in git-web--browse.sh? If we use the established escape
> hatch implemented by valid_custom_tool() helper there by setting
> browser.*.cmd, would that be sufficient to work around the "Git
> checks if the browser is known"?
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-help.txt b/Documentation/git-help.txt
>> index 40d328a..eeb1950 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/git-help.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/git-help.txt
>> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ git-help - Display help information about Git
>> SYNOPSIS
>> --------
>> [verse]
>> -'git help' [-a|--all] [-g|--guide]
>> +'git help' [-a|--all] [-e|--exclude-guides] [-g|--guide]
>> [-i|--info|-m|--man|-w|--web] [COMMAND|GUIDE]
>
> So, let's not do this.
>
>> diff --git a/builtin/help.c b/builtin/help.c
>> index e8f79d7..40901a9 100644
>> --- a/builtin/help.c
>> +++ b/builtin/help.c
>> @@ -37,8 +37,10 @@ static int show_all = 0;
>> static int show_guides = 0;
>> static unsigned int colopts;
>> static enum help_format help_format = HELP_FORMAT_NONE;
>> +static int exclude_guides;
>> static struct option builtin_help_options[] = {
>> OPT_BOOL('a', "all", &show_all, N_("print all available commands")),
>> + OPT_BOOL('e', "exclude-guides", &exclude_guides, N_("exclude guides")),
>
> So I'd suggest using PARSE_OPT_HIDDEN for this one and drop 'e' shorthand.
> The only caller of this mode does not use it.
>
>> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
>> index c1b2135..b148164 100644
>> --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
>> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
>> @@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ _git_help ()
>> {
>> case "$cur" in
>> --*)
>> - __gitcomp "--all --guides --info --man --web"
>> + __gitcomp "--all --exclude-guides --guides --info --man --web"
>> return
>> ;;
>> esac
>
> So, let's not do this.
>
>> diff --git a/t/t0012-help.sh b/t/t0012-help.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000..fb1abd7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/t/t0012-help.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh
>> +
>> +test_description='help'
>> +
>> +. ./test-lib.sh
>> +
>> +configure_help () {
>> + test_config help.format html &&
>> + test_config help.htmlpath test://html &&
>> + test_config help.browser firefox
>> +}
>
> Would replacing the last line with:
>
> test_config browser.test.cmd ./test-browser &&
> test_config help.browser test
>
> and then writing to test-browser work just as well? If so, that
> would be much cleaner and more preferrable.
>
I wasn't aware that this is a way to configure things. Thanks.
>> +
>> +test_expect_success "setup" "
>> + write_script firefox <<-\EOF
>> + exit 0
>> + EOF
>> +"
>
> Unless there is a good reason you MUST do so, avoid quoting the test
> body with double quotes, as it invites mistakes [*1*].
>
The test-browser was supposed to be returning just a success
which is good enough for my usage.
> Also, how about using something like:
>
> write_script test-browser <<-\EOF
> i=0
> for arg
> do
> i=$(( $i + 1 ))
> echo "$i: $arg"
> done >test-browser.log
> EOF
>
> instead? That way, you can ensure that "git help status" attempts
> to call git-status.html with the expected path, not gitstatus.html
> or status.html, or somesuch, immediately after running "git help
> status" in the next test by inspecting test-browser.log ...
>
We can use this to check whether the correct file was tried to open.
Not a part of this "does it work" test, but good for new ones.
>> +test_expect_success "works for commands and guides by default" "
>> + configure_help &&
>> + git help status &&
>
> ... right here.
>
> The output from the test-browser does not have to be multi-line;
> just doing
>
> echo "$*"
>
> might be sufficient.
>
>> + git help revisions
>> +"
>
> Thanks.
>
> [Footnote]
>
> *1* Can you immediately tell why this test is broken?
>
> test_expect_success "two commits do not have the same ID" "
> git commit --allow-empty -m first &&
> one=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
> test_tick &&
> git commit --allow-empty -m second &&
> two=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
> test $one != $two
> "
>
I'm afraid I can't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html