On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 12:17 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.c
> om> wrote:
>
> >
> > @@ -487,12 +490,14 @@ static void do_submodule_path(struct strbuf
> > *buf, const char *path,
> > strbuf_addstr(buf, git_dir);
> > }
> > if (!is_git_directory(buf->buf)) {
> > + gitmodules_config();
>
> We determined via chat that calling gitmodules_config
> is not harmful w.r.t. correctness, but might require some
> improvements in the future for performance.
> (i.e. we may want to add in a later series a
> if (already called gitmodules_config)
> set flag "already called gitmodules_config";
> return;
> into gitmodules_config)
>
> >
> >
> > char *git_pathdup_submodule(const char *path, const char *fmt,
> > ...)
> > {
> > + int err;
> > va_list args;
> > struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> > va_start(args, fmt);
> > - do_submodule_path(&buf, path, fmt, args);
> > + err = do_submodule_path(&buf, path, fmt, args);
> > va_end(args);
> > + if (err)
>
> Here we need a strbuf_release(&buf) to avoid a memory leak?
No, cause we "strbuf_detach" after this to return the buffer? Or is
that not safe?
Thanks,
Jake
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�