Hi Stephen,
Stephen Morton <stephen.morton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> + if (multiple_commits)
> + advise(_("after resolving the conflicts,
> mark the corrected paths with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'\n"
> + "then continue with 'git %s
> --continue'\n"
> + "or cancel with 'git %s
> --abort'" ), action_name(opts), action_name(opts));
> + else
> + advise(_("after resolving the
> conflicts, mark the corrected paths\n"
> + "with 'git add <paths>' or 'git
> rm <paths>'\n"
> + "and commit the result with
> 'git commit'"));
In both cases (multiple_commits or not), the beginning of the advise
is nearly the same, with only a '\n' in the middle being the
difference:
multiple_commits:
"after resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths with 'git
add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'\n"
!multiple_commits:
"after resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths\n with 'git
add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'\n"
~~~~~~~^
In 'multiple_commits' case the advise is more than 80 characters long,
did you forget the '\n' in that case?
If you end up using the same beginning of advice, maybe it's possible
to give it before the 'if(multiple_commits)' and avoid duplication of
the lines.
Thanks,
Rémi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html