Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sharness v1.0.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yeah, I don't think it has kept up with our work. My statement above was
> "I don't think we'd _ever_ want to consider sharness the upstream, even
> if it were up to date", but obviously there would be a lot of work to
> even get it there.

I actually was a lot more optimistic when they started, and if it
were up to date, I would have at least tried to see what the damage
to our t/ part will be if we swapped t/test-lib{,-functions}.sh with
it, which was the original reason why I took a look until I found
out that it did not have some things.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]