On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:43:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I don't think the Git project would ever want to say "sharness is the > > upstream, and we are now just a user of it". But I wonder if we could > > break down test-lib.sh to keep the Git-specific parts separate, which > > would make it easier for sharness to pull the other bits as a whole. > > I took a quick look around, and it seems that this is an outdated > fork made without getting much of the improvement from its upstream > since it forked. It does not seem to have lazy prerequisite, for > example. Yeah, I don't think it has kept up with our work. My statement above was "I don't think we'd _ever_ want to consider sharness the upstream, even if it were up to date", but obviously there would be a lot of work to even get it there. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html