Re: Mark remote `gc --auto` error messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:59:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > So the greater question is not "should this output be marked" but
> > "should auto-gc data go over the sideband so that all clients see it
> > (and any server-side stderr does not)". And I think the answer is
> > probably yes. And that fixes the "remote: " thing as a side effect.
> 
> Thanks for stating this a lot more clearly than I could, and I agree
> that sending this to the other side regardless of the protocol is
> the right thing.  I somehow doubt that server operators would check
> Apache logs to decide when to do a proper GC, so I do not consider
> it a true loss ;-)

I definitely agree. I'd wonder more about "would they want their users
to see these details". I dunno. I am only intimately familiar with one
git hosting site, and we turn off auto-gc completely.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]