Re: Mark remote `gc --auto` error messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 at 21:33:33, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Lukas Fleischer <lfleischer@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > When running `git push`, it might occur that error messages are
> > transferred from the server to the client. While most messages (those
> > explicitly sent on sideband 2) are prefixed with "remote:", it seems
> > that error messages printed during the automatic householding performed
> > by git-gc(1) are displayed without any additional decoration. Thus, such
> > messages can easily be misinterpreted as git-gc failing locally, see [1]
> > for an actual example of where that happened.
> 
> Sounds like a sensible goal to me.

What exactly are you referring to (you only quoted the introduction)?
Do you think we should fix the git-gc issue but keep the general
behavior of printing messages unaltered? Do you think it would be
worthwhile to make server messages distinguishable in general?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]