Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] travis-ci: enable sequential test execution for t9113 and 9126

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> On 19 May 2016, at 19:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> 
>> >>> Anyways, how about making the tests run on separate ports and
>> >>> not worry about serializing them at all?
>> >> 
>> >> Yeah, that does sound like a more sensible approach.
>> >
>> > Makes sense. However, it's not something I will tackle soon.
>> > Would you be willing to pick up $gmane/295048 (the first patch) as is 
>> > and drop $gmane/295050 (the patch discussed here)? Then the majority
>> > of Git SVN tests would run on Travis CI.
>> 
>> I am not sure if adding git-svn alone would be a good change.
>> Wouldn't it invite false failures from running these conflicting
>> tests at the same time?
>
> The problematic tests won't run unless *_PORT variables are set;
> which AFAIK they aren't, yet.

Ahh, OK that is perfect.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]