Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On 19 May 2016, at 19:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Anyways, how about making the tests run on separate ports and >>> not worry about serializing them at all? >> >> Yeah, that does sound like a more sensible approach. > > Makes sense. However, it's not something I will tackle soon. > Would you be willing to pick up $gmane/295048 (the first patch) as is > and drop $gmane/295050 (the patch discussed here)? Then the majority > of Git SVN tests would run on Travis CI. I am not sure if adding git-svn alone would be a good change. Wouldn't it invite false failures from running these conflicting tests at the same time? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html