On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > + for i in `seq -w 100` > > + do > > + echo $i >file_$i && > > + dd if=/dev/urandom bs=8k count=1 >>file_$i && > > + git-update-index --add file_$i || return 1 > > + done && > > Is there a way for our tests to be a bit more stable than > urandom? I saw on the first run fsck was OOM-killed, but the > second and subsequent run did not. It's a bit hard to diagnose. The problem here is that I really need large amount of random data that doesn't compress nor delta between objects. Hmmm what we need is a random data generator that always produces the same thing. I'll hack something to replace urandom. Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html