Re: [PATCH 13/10] tests for various pack index features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:

> This is a fairly complete list of tests for various aspects of pack 
> index versions 1 and  2.
>
> Tests on index v2 include 32-bit and 64-bit offsets, as well as a nice 
> demonstration of the flawed repacking integrity checks that index 
> version 2 intend to solve over index version 1 with the per object CRC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> OK this should really be the last patch for this topic.
>
> diff --git a/t/t5302-pack-index.sh b/t/t5302-pack-index.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..3371964
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t5302-pack-index.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +#
> +# Copyright (c) 2007 Nicolas Pitre
> +#
> +
> +test_description='pack index with 64-bit offsets and object CRC'
> +. ./test-lib.sh
> +
> +test_expect_success \
> +    'setup' \
> +    'rm -rf .git
> +     git-init &&
> +     for i in `seq -w 100`
> +     do
> +         echo $i >file_$i &&
> +         dd if=/dev/urandom bs=8k count=1 >>file_$i &&
> +         git-update-index --add file_$i || return 1
> +     done &&

Is there a way for our tests to be a bit more stable than
urandom?  I saw on the first run fsck was OOM-killed, but the
second and subsequent run did not.  It's a bit hard to diagnose.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]