On 5/6/2016 10:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Li Peng <lip@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Fix duplicate words of "output" in comment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Peng <lip@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> t/t0000-basic.sh | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh
>> index 79b9074..60811a3 100755
>> --- a/t/t0000-basic.sh
>> +++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ check_sub_test_lib_test () {
>> }
>>
>> check_sub_test_lib_test_err () {
>> - name="$1" # stdin is the expected output output from the test
>> + name="$1" # stdin is the expected output from the test
> The original is marginally correct. The first "output" is a noun,
> "expected output", the second one is a pp of verb "to output",
> i.e. "to produce".
>
> I would have written it as "the expected output produced by the
> test", though.
Right, the original form is quite hard to understand %)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html