Li Peng <lip@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Fix duplicate words of "output" in comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Peng <lip@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> t/t0000-basic.sh | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh
> index 79b9074..60811a3 100755
> --- a/t/t0000-basic.sh
> +++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ check_sub_test_lib_test () {
> }
>
> check_sub_test_lib_test_err () {
> - name="$1" # stdin is the expected output output from the test
> + name="$1" # stdin is the expected output from the test
The original is marginally correct. The first "output" is a noun,
"expected output", the second one is a pp of verb "to output",
i.e. "to produce".
I would have written it as "the expected output produced by the
test", though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html