Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>>> I wonder if the patches mentioned have something to do with the "git >>>>> add deep/in/the/tree" that fails to notice deep/in/ is an unrelated >>>>> repository in some way? >> >> The same functionality is added in 8745024 (parse_pathspec: support >> stripping/checking submodule paths - 2013-07-14) so if it didn't fail >> to notice that before 5a76aff1a6 and did after, it's a bug. > > The bug seems to have existed before. However in the bug we are talking > about the nested repo is not a submodule yet. That agrees with Duy's recollection below: >> I vaguely recall this symptom. It has something to do with the index, >> the check we do requires a gitlink in the index, I think. So if the >> gitlink entry is not in the index, our protection line fails. So are we all on the same page that this is a bug now? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html