Re: [PATCH v6 03/19] index-helper: new daemon for caching index and related stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Turner <dturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Per working tree/repository, yes (not quite per-index because working
> trees with split indexes have two).

Heh, I consider "split index" merely an implementation detail of a
(logical) single index file that happens to be represented with two
physical files.

Anyway, thanks for clarification.

> Why do we try to avoid select(2)?  It seems marginally less efficient
> for small numbers of fds, and might not scale to large numbers of fds,
> but we're not using it in a performance-critical way, and we only care
> about one fd at a time.

Just that having to deal with two APIs that do very similar things
is less preferrable than just using one that was designed later by
those who learned lessons while using the older one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]