Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] index-helper: new daemon for caching index and related stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David,

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, David Turner wrote:

> On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 16:14 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > 
> > > Am 07.04.2016 um 00:11 schrieb David Turner:
> > > > +static void share_index(struct index_state *istate, struct shm
> > > > *is)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	void *new_mmap;
> > > > +	if (istate->mmap_size <= 20 ||
> > > > +	    hashcmp(istate->sha1,
> > > > +		    (unsigned char *)istate->mmap + istate
> > > > ->mmap_size - 20)
> > > > > > 
> > > > +	    !hashcmp(istate->sha1, is->sha1) ||
> > > > +	    git_shm_map(O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_RDWR, 0700, istate
> > > > ->mmap_size,
> > > > +			&new_mmap, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> > > > MAP_SHARED,
> > > > +			"git-index-%s", sha1_to_hex(istate
> > > > ->sha1)) < 0)
> > > 
> > > Builds which have NO_MMAP set require that MAP_PRIVATE is set. So I
> > > would
> > > guess that at this point you leave those builds behind. Unless we
> > > declare
> > > such systems as hopelessly outdated and remove NO_MMAP and
> > > compat/mmap.c or
> > > you support index-helper only when NO_MMAP is not set.
> > 
> > I vote for the latter: support index-helper only when NO_MMAP is
> > unset.
> 
> Will fix, thanks.

Thank you!

Just for the record, I was really pushing forward with my rebase--helper
work, is the only reason I did not review your index-helper series yet!

Thanks,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]