Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] index-helper: new daemon for caching index and related stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> Am 07.04.2016 um 00:11 schrieb David Turner:
> > +static void share_index(struct index_state *istate, struct shm *is)
> > +{
> > +	void *new_mmap;
> > +	if (istate->mmap_size <= 20 ||
> > +	    hashcmp(istate->sha1,
> > +		    (unsigned char *)istate->mmap + istate->mmap_size - 20)
> > ||
> > +	    !hashcmp(istate->sha1, is->sha1) ||
> > +	    git_shm_map(O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_RDWR, 0700, istate->mmap_size,
> > +			&new_mmap, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
> > +			"git-index-%s", sha1_to_hex(istate->sha1)) < 0)
> 
> Builds which have NO_MMAP set require that MAP_PRIVATE is set. So I would
> guess that at this point you leave those builds behind. Unless we declare
> such systems as hopelessly outdated and remove NO_MMAP and compat/mmap.c or
> you support index-helper only when NO_MMAP is not set.

I vote for the latter: support index-helper only when NO_MMAP is unset.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]