Re: [PATCH] git-format-patch.txt: don't show -s as shorthand for multiple options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Given that the ifndef/endif block immediately before this part is
>>> also about excluding -p/-u/--patch when formatting the documentation
>>> for format-patch, perhaps the attached may be a smaller equivalent?
>>
>> Perhaps. I kept self-contained to make it easier to add new options
>> between the two if need be, but I don't feel strongly about it.
>
> I don't either, but the reason why I thought it would make sense to
> have them in the same block is because hiding --no-patch and --patch
> are about the same theme: format-patch is about presenting the diff,
> and neither disabling diff output nor explicitly asking for diff
> output makes sense.

That's reasonable. Should I re-roll, or would you like to amend it locally?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]