Re: git-index-pack really does suck..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Make it conditionnal on --stdin then.  This covers all cases where we 
> > really want the secure thing to happen, and the --stdin case already 
> > perform the atomic rename-and-move thing when the pack is fully indexed.
> 
> Repacking objects in a repository uses pack-objects without
> using index-pack, as you suggested Chris.  Is there a sane usage
> of index-pack that does not use --stdin?  I do not think of any.
> 
> If there isn't, the "conditional on --stdin" suggestion means we
> unconditionally do the secure thing for all the sane usage, and
> go unsecure for an insane usage that we do not really care about.
> 
> If so, it seems to me that it would be the simplest not to touch
> the code at all, except that missing free().

That's exactly what I think as well.

> Am I missing something?

Not from my point of view.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]