Re: git-index-pack really does suck..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[sorry, sent a message without finishing]

Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Maybe we shouldn't run index-pack on packs for which we _already_ have 
> an index for which is the most likely reason for the collision check to 
> trigger in the first place.
>
> This is in the same category as trying to run unpack-objects on a pack 
> within a repository and wondering why it doesn't work.
> ...
> I'm of the opinion that this patch is unnecessary.  It only helps in 
> bogus workflows to start with, and it makes the default behavior unsafe 
> (unsafe from a paranoid pov, but still).  And in the _normal_ workflow 
> it should never trigger.

Hmmmm.  You may have a point.

So maybe we should retitle this thread from "git-index-pack
really does suck.." to "I used git-index-pack in a stupid way"?
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]