On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I stated it wrongly. What I was getting at was that we might > want to consider an abbreviation that matches only a single > commit unambiguous even when there are ambiguous objects of > other kinds. Maybe. But by the time your object hash distribution starts showing ambiguous objects with a given abbreviated name between a commit and a non commit, I'll bet you'll start to see ambiguities between commits soon enough as well. > Not that I consider it a pressing issue, though. Indeed. And even then it is not something really hard to implement either. Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html