Re: [PATCH 02/15] ref-filter: implement %(if:equals=<string>) and %(if:notequals=<string>)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> You're correct, the "handler" functions run once for each "ref". But WRT
>> to the %(if)...%(then)...%(else)...%(end) atoms, it needs to be. Because
>> each outcome of these atoms depend on the current outcome of the fields
>> used between then WRT to the current ref.
>
> Yeah, there is no argument against that part at all.  My comment was purely
> about preparsing the if_equals field. All other fields are preparsed in *parse()
> helper functions and it looked strange that only these two are scanned in the
> handle() function every time it is evaluated for each ref, only to yield the
> same result.

True, I definitely agree, will fix that in the next iteration, thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Karthik Nayak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]