Re: [PATCH 02/15] ref-filter: implement %(if:equals=<string>) and %(if:notequals=<string>)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You're correct, the "handler" functions run once for each "ref". But WRT
> to the %(if)...%(then)...%(else)...%(end) atoms, it needs to be. Because
> each outcome of these atoms depend on the current outcome of the fields
> used between then WRT to the current ref.

Yeah, there is no argument against that part at all.  My comment was purely
about preparsing the if_equals field. All other fields are preparsed in *parse()
helper functions and it looked strange that only these two are scanned in the
handle() function every time it is evaluated for each ref, only to yield the
same result.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]