Re: [PATCH] Keep rename/rename conflicts of intermediate merges while doing recursive merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alex Riesen wrote:

> The result seem to be at least predictable. Still, doesn't it mean
> that once a rename/rename conflict is in it has to be resolved
> manually forever?

What about git-rerere2 idea (recording resolving of tree-level conflicts,
i.e. rename/rename and such)?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]