Re: SEGV in git-merge recursive:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alex Riesen, Thu, Mar 29, 2007 17:04:31 +0200:
> CONFLICT (rename/rename): Rename 1->a in branch HEAD rename 1->b in B
> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
> 
> Tom, either the stack trace of -O0 -ggdb or your repo is badly needed.
> The stack preferred, as I have that feeling it'll just work everywhere
> else but your system (can you try it somewhere else, BTW?).

Ok-key... Thanks Tom, for the testcase. I believe we haven't had this
one yet: the merge base in the second (inner) merge is the initial
commit. Which is strange:

(gdb) p *merged_common_ancestors
$4 = {
  object = {
    parsed = 1,
    used = 0,
    type = 0,
    flags = 0,
    sha1 = "\001", '\0' <repeats 18 times>
  },
  util = 0x8082b40,
  date = 0,
  parents = 0x8ff5180,
  tree = 0x0,
  buffer = 0x0
}

tree == 0x0? Strange, I don't get why it is NULL, the initial commit
definitely hase a tree (git cat-file -p initial-commit shows a tree
name and there is a tree with that object name).

The structure looks like this:

    o---o-o-o---o-o-o-o-o
     \   ____\_/
      \ /     \
       o-------o-o-o-o

Fsck reports no errors.
Still looking into it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]