Re: [PATCHv19 00/11] Expose submodule parallelism to the user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Maybe we want to remove the struct child_process from the
> function signature of the callbacks and callbacks need to rely on
> the data provided solely thru the pointer as passed around for
> callback purposes, which the user is free to use for any kind
> of data.

I think that is the most sensible.

> As a rather quickfix for 2.8 (and 2.7) we could however just
> breakup the finish_command function and call child_process_clear
> after the callbacks have run.

That would not fix the case where run_command() fails, clears child
and then start failure callback, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]