Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Am 25.02.2016 um 15:21 schrieb Jeff King:
>> +munge () {
>> + printf "$3" | dd of="$1" bs=1 conv=notrunc seek=$2
>> +}
>
> Instead of adding another call of dd, would it be an option to insert
> the following patch at the front of this series and then use
> test_overwrite_bytes?
It would be an option, but I'd want to merge this to 'next' today
without waiting for a reroll. Change from dd to custom script can
be done as a follow-up topic after the dust settles, if necessary.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html