Re: [PATCH] t9100: fix breakage when SHELL_PATH is not /bin/sh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> 
> > Assuming your patch works on Windows
> 
> If it re-introduces that chmod +x, it won't.
> 
> Please note that my *original* patch actually only guarded the chmod +x,
> but Junio suggested switching to write_script and since it passed the test
> suite here, I though it would be safe.
> 
> I still think write_script is the better alternative.

I'm confused why it matters. write_script() unconditionally calls "chmod
+x", doesn't it?

I just double-checked its definition in test-lib-function.sh; am I
missing some Windows-specific magic that kicks in?

> So why not just prefix it with `SHELL_PATH=/bin/sh`?

But then what is write_script buying us?

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]