Re: [PATCH 8/8] one ugly test to verify basic functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Elia,

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Elia Pinto wrote:

> From the git coding guideline : "We prefer $( ... ) for command
> substitution; unlike ``, it properly nests.  It should have been the way
> Bourne spelled it from day one, but unfortunately isn't."

There was only one time in my life as a developer when I had to change a
$(...) to a `...` construct. I do not really remember all the details, but
I think it was on MacOSX, and it was inside a case ... esac and the
closing parentheses was mistaken for a case arm (the $(...) construct
might have been multi-line, is the only thing that would make sense in my
mind.

Did you hear of similar problems?

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]