Re: [PATCH 4/8] submodule-config: introduce parse_generic_submodule_config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> This rewrites parse_config to distinguish between configs specific to
>> one submodule and configs which apply generically to all submodules.
>> We do not have generic submodule configs yet, but the next patch will
>> introduce "submodule.fetchJobs".
>
> OK.
>
>> +static int parse_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data)
>> +{
>> +     struct parse_config_parameter *me = data;
>> +     int subsection_len;
>> +     const char *subsection, *key;
>> +
>> +     if (parse_config_key(var, "submodule", &subsection,
>> +                          &subsection_len, &key) < 0)
>> +             return 0;
>> +
>> +     if (!subsection_len)
>> +             return parse_generic_submodule_config(key, var, value, me);
>
> The same comment as in the footnote for the review on [3/8] applies
> here.

Ok, so we want to have

    [section ""]

and

    [section]

be different, such that we could have a submodule with an "" name,
but still be able to differentiate to the common section which should be
applied to all submodules?

It sounds like a corner case to me, but if we want to guarantee such a behavior,
let me see if test cases for that need some special love in this series.

Thanks,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]